JUST NOW: Fetterman Throws In With Republicans - Chuck Schumer Is Livid
Fetterman Warns Democrats After Michigan Progressive Wins—But the Results Do Not Amount to a DSA Takeover
Michigan’s Democratic primaries handed the party’s progressive wing several important victories this month, and Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania responded in the way he increasingly has when he thinks his party is moving in the wrong direction: publicly and without much effort to soften the message.
The most important result came in the race for Michigan’s open U.S. Senate seat, where Abdul El-Sayed narrowly defeated Rep. Haley Stevens after a bitter primary that became a test of the party’s direction on health care, corporate money, Israel and the influence of online progressive politics.
Fetterman argued that Democrats should be cautious about what those victories mean for November.
Speaking to Fox News Digital during the Israel on Campus Coalition’s National Leadership Summit in Washington, Fetterman criticized the growing political influence of left-wing streamer Hasan Piker, who campaigned with El-Sayed during the primary.
Fetterman said Democrats should not elevate someone he described as a communist simply because that person has a large audience on Twitch. He argued that admiration for communist governments or leaders should be “foreign to any Democrat.”
That criticism quickly became part of a larger argument about what Michigan’s primary results say about the Democratic Party.
There is evidence that the party’s left had a strong night.
El-Sayed defeated Stevens 48.5 percent to 47.5 percent, overcoming a major spending disadvantage and the support Stevens received from much of the Democratic establishment. He will now face Republican Mike Rogers in November in a race that could help determine control of the Senate.
In Michigan’s 13th Congressional District, state Rep. Donavan McKinney defeated incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar. McKinney had the formal backing of the Democratic Socialists of America, and the organization celebrated his victory as another addition to its growing group of congressional allies.
William Lawrence also won the Democratic nomination in Michigan’s competitive 7th Congressional District. Lawrence is a co-founder of the Sunrise Movement and has described himself as a democratic socialist. Reporting after the primary said he had allowed his DSA membership to lapse shortly before the election.
Those results gave Fetterman and other critics of the party’s left something concrete to point to.
But grouping all three candidates together as DSA nominees obscures an important distinction.
El-Sayed is not a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and has explicitly rejected the socialist label. During the campaign, he described himself as a capitalist who wants stronger regulation, a larger social safety net and policies including Medicare for All.
His relationship with Piker is real, and politically significant, but it is not the same thing as DSA membership or an endorsement from the organization.
El-Sayed appeared with Piker at campaign events and defended the decision as part of an effort to reach younger and politically disengaged voters. He has also said he does not agree with everything Piker has said.
That distinction matters because Piker has become a symbol in the broader fight over the boundaries of the Democratic coalition.
His enormous online following gives him access to voters traditional campaigns often struggle to reach. At the same time, past comments about the September 11 attacks, Israel and other subjects have made him a liability in the eyes of many Democrats who worry that association with him will provide Republicans with damaging material in competitive general elections.
Fetterman has placed himself firmly in that camp.
After El-Sayed’s victory, he continued criticizing the Michigan nominee and described the primary campaign as arrogant. He warned that some of El-Sayed’s rhetoric and political associations could become vulnerabilities when the electorate expands beyond Democratic primary voters.
The warning is not difficult to understand politically.
El-Sayed won the nomination by only about one percentage point and finished below 50 percent. That is still a victory, and an impressive one given the financial disadvantage he faced, but it also means nearly half of Democratic primary voters chose Stevens.
Michigan is not a safe Democratic state in a Senate general election. The seat is open because Democratic Sen. Gary Peters is retiring, and both parties view the race between El-Sayed and Rogers as one of the contests most likely to influence which party controls the chamber.
That makes questions about ideological positioning more consequential than they would be in a heavily Democratic congressional district.
McKinney’s victory is a different kind of test.
His 13th District is centered on Detroit and strongly favors Democrats, making the primary far more important than the general election in determining who will represent the district. His victory is therefore strong evidence that democratic socialist candidates can win support inside a major Democratic constituency, but it tells voters less about how the same politics will perform statewide.
Lawrence’s race may provide a more direct general-election test. Michigan’s 7th District is competitive, and he will face Republican incumbent Tom Barrett. That contest will give both parties a clearer measure of whether a candidate with Lawrence’s progressive and democratic-socialist background can win swing voters in November.
The broader primary map also complicates the idea that Democrats simply moved in one ideological direction.
On the same August 4 primary night, Rep. Wesley Bell defeated former Rep. Cori Bush in Missouri, ending a comeback attempt by one of the best-known democratic socialists in Congress. A week later in Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley narrowly defeated democratic socialist Francesca Hong in the Democratic gubernatorial primary.
In other words, progressive candidates have momentum, but moderate Democrats are still winning important races too.
Fetterman’s criticism of the party extends beyond Michigan.
At the same Washington conference, he criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom over comments earlier this year in which Newsom used the term “apartheid” while discussing Israel and the direction of its government.
There is additional context to that dispute.
Newsom later said he regretted using the term and explained that he had meant it as a warning about where Israel could be headed under its current leadership, not as a categorical description of the country as it exists today. Fetterman nevertheless argued that the original language reflected a broader movement inside the Democratic Party away from the strongly pro-Israel position he continues to defend.
That disagreement has become one of the clearest ideological divides among Democrats.
El-Sayed has called for ending U.S. military funding to Israel and has made opposition to the influence of pro-Israel political spending a central part of his political identity. Fetterman, by contrast, remains one of the Senate’s most outspoken supporters of Israel and has repeatedly broken with members of his party on Middle East policy.
The conflict is therefore about more than personalities.
It is a dispute over what kinds of candidates Democrats should nominate, what voices they should welcome into their coalition and whether positions that energize progressive primary voters can survive the different electorate of a statewide general election.
Fetterman clearly believes some of the party’s recent choices are dangerous.
But several claims often attached to that argument go beyond what the Michigan results establish.
The results do not show that the Democratic Party has become a communist party. El-Sayed is not a DSA member and rejects the socialist label. McKinney is a genuine DSA-backed democratic socialist, but he won in an overwhelmingly Democratic district. Lawrence has stronger ties to democratic socialism, but he still has to prove himself in a competitive general election.
Nor do the results establish that Fetterman is the only prominent Democrat willing to object to the party’s leftward pressure. Other Democratic officials, candidates and strategists have criticized Piker, questioned the electability of democratic socialist candidates and warned about positions they believe could alienate moderates.
What Fetterman does offer is a particularly visible version of that argument from inside the Democratic Senate caucus.
He has made clear that he is not becoming a Republican. Instead, he is arguing that his party should preserve room for a more centrist, strongly pro-Israel politics even as progressive activists and candidates gain influence.
Michigan will now provide one of the clearest tests of that disagreement.
If El-Sayed defeats Rogers, progressives will be able to argue that the warnings about his ideology and associations underestimated his ability to build a statewide coalition.
If he loses a race Democrats believe they needed to win, Fetterman and other critics will almost certainly point back to the primary and argue that electability concerns were dismissed too easily.
For now, the strongest conclusion is narrower.
Michigan showed that the Democratic left has real organizational strength, real candidates and real voters. It also showed the limits of treating every progressive victory as evidence of the same ideological movement.
May you like
Fetterman’s warning is part of a genuine fight over the Democratic Party’s future.
The November results will tell voters far more about which side of that argument has the stronger case.
